An alert reader sent us this item from HuffPoo:
NEW YORK — A mock movie poster warns al-Qaida wants to return to New York City, but authorities say there's no evidence of an actual threat.
Investigators say an overseas, Arab-language Internet site posted the amateur graphic on its "artwork and design" page. The NYPD has been monitoring the site.
If you’re like us, the most shocking thing about this is news item that anyone would describe this crapfest as a mock movie poster. A mock movie subway 2-sheet… maybe. And excuse us, where is the billing block? Oh, it’s a teaser, you say? Well, then we still need to see a tag line and the release date featured prominently at the bottom.









































Wrong proportion, missing text, no logo, no legal. Damn amateurs.
Posted by: A. Finisher | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 09:52 AM
It's a 2 SHEET, dufus.
Posted by: A. Starter | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 09:53 AM
Shouldn't it read "COMING AGAIN SOON TO NEW YORK"? Coming IN has an entirely different meaning, no?
Posted by: Inside Job | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 09:57 AM
Now, the NYPD's probably monitoring MonkeyArtAwards too. http://tinyurl.com/6vuh7qr
Posted by: Perry Noyd | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 12:00 PM
Maybe NY looks different from the air guys, but I just can't get past the 1500ft mountain in the middle of the city. Buy some stock ya cheap assed malcontents.
Posted by: LemonLight | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 02:05 PM
Dear A. Starter,
Are you addressing us as “dufus”? Or are you calling the HuffPoo writer a dufus for not correctly identifying the image as a 2-sheet?
If so, you will see that we already made that point in our post, dufus.
Posted by: Edwina Trout | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 04:46 PM
Still not as scary as that "Dallas" shower scene.
Posted by: Roger Kaputnik | Wednesday, April 04, 2012 at 06:10 PM
A Starter must be an art director. I’ve never known an art director who was capable of reading anything other a comic book.
Posted by: A. Exec | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 08:52 AM
That's probably because he/she was actually WORKING, A. Exec.
Posted by: Art Director | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 09:27 AM
It's 5:30, do you know where all the account execs are?
Posted by: AD | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 10:07 AM
Hey A. Exec, you should have a copywriter proof your comments before you post them. Unless they're too busy WORKING.
Posted by: sam | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 10:56 AM
I think A. Starter's "dufus" comment was aimed at A. Finisher saying that the so-called mock poster was the wrong proportion, hence the parody of A. Starter's signature. Apparently, everyone is on the wrong commenter's case about not reading the whole post. …and what a wonderful read it was.
Posted by: Sid Shady | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 02:34 PM
Actually, anyone who refers to them selves as a "finisher", sounds like a dufus. You're a retoucher, dude. Get over it.
Posted by: A. Whole | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 05:17 PM
Aren't inflated titles the norm for Entertainment Design?
Creative Director = Art Director
Art Director = Designer
Account Exec = Account Coordinator
Finisher = Retoucher
Posted by: just sayin' | Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 06:16 PM
Hey A. Whole --- how about you shave off that goatee and get with the 21st century. Digital art is finished. Retouching went out with the chromogenic color print.
Posted by: Byte Me | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 08:44 AM
Byte Me, you must be still "on the box." Join the 21st century and do your own work instead of telling some "finisher" what you want "retouched". Nice hat, by the way, very ironic.
Posted by: A. Whole | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 08:52 AM
A. Whole...anyone who spells "themselves" as two words is a dufus AND a schmuck.
Posted by: Michael Ginsberg | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 10:16 AM
You have time to do your own finishing, A Whole? You must not have a lot of jobs where you work.
Posted by: Swamped | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 10:56 AM
You must not be that "swamped" if you have time to blog-tificate here.
Posted by: A. Whole | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 11:47 AM
I see someone let the children loose on the blog again.
A. Starter,
Before calling someone a dufus you might first have a general idea about what you are talking about. That piece of "art" is many things, but its not a 2-sheet. Not even close. I've done a few horizontal kiosks near that proportion, a building or two (the Hotel Figeroa comes to mind), and even a Bus Wrap, but never a 2-sheet.
Posted by: A. Finisher | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 05:54 PM
I think we established that it wasn't a 2 sheet awhile back and that "dufus" refers to anyone who refers to themselves as "a finisher".
Posted by: A. Starter | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 06:38 PM
I want to insert the simultaneous roll eyes, jack-off hand gesture emoticon. That function's gotta be around here someplace...
Posted by: flAVor flAVe | Friday, April 06, 2012 at 07:30 PM
Dear A. Starter,
We apologize for misunderstanding the intended target of your “dufus” insult and for calling you a dufus in the process.
Posted by: Edwina Trout | Saturday, April 07, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Dear A. Finisher,
Some of our readers are very old and think this site was set on a Linotype machine and mortised into the Internet via tubes; hence their nostalgic longing for the by-gone era of retouching and rotary dial telephones. Please, bear with them, for someday you will be old and cranky, too.
Posted by: Edwina Trout | Saturday, April 07, 2012 at 12:13 PM
So that's how it's done.
Posted by: J.R. | Monday, April 09, 2012 at 05:31 PM