The very same barking mad account exec featured in our previous post was thoughtful enough to cc us on this letter he fired off to the LA Times in regards to Patrick Goldstein’s comment, "It's only fair to give Warners' marketing staff some credit here too…”
Mr. Goldstein,
As a former executive at one of LA's busier entertainment advertising agencies, I can make a strong argument in favor of credit for the campaigns you mention, specifically Four Christmases, belonging to the folks who lost their jobs at the previous "New Line Cinema". I was personally part of a team assigned Four Christmases in late 2007 and saw the delivery of title treatments and sketches to a rudderless marketing department handing out creative direction without a clue as to where or how the Studio wanted to market this property, before I was removed from the project when new, and soon to be fired, executives were brought on board the sinking NLC ship.
While I request anonymity, proof exists that whichever marketing department finalized Four Christmases, their work was pretty much done for them and all they had left to do was waste tens of thousands of dollars in hiring new agencies, demanding more rounds of creative exploration, and, as is the case in 99.99% of marketing campaigns in this business, cover their collective asses.
Sincerely,
James Ensor
And yes, all you poncy art school grads, despite the AE's request for anonymity, we know he is, in fact, that famous Belgian impressionist.